Thursday, October 16, 2008

The Bible and Missional Listening

This was the title of a talk that Scot McKnight gave at the Missional Theology Conversation gathering I attended last Friday.  His main focus was for us to understand the Bible through a relational approach instead of an authority approach.  I'll try my best to break down what he was talking about and hopefully it will spur some conversation among us as well.

McKnight set up two different approaches to the Bible that we can take.  The first he called the authoritarian approach.  This approach uses a flow that looks something like this.  God-revelation-inspiration-inerrancy-truth-response-submission.  This is an approach that many of us are very familiar with and have spent much of our time in ministry combating.  "God said it, I believe it, and that's good enough for me."  This approach leads to things being very black and white with no room for gray.  McKnight says that the words inerrancy and submission are the most troubling with this approach.  He used Psalm 119 as an example where scripture (or the law) is not for submission purposes but to be followed out of response.  Vs 35, "Lead me in the path of your commandments, for I delight in it." (ESV)  Notice that it doesn't say "your words are authoritative so therefore I submit", instead it's "your words are a delight therefore I will follow."  This authoritarian approach is framed epistemically (knowledge is the desired outcome) and seems not to be what the God of the Bible is desiring.

The approach that McKnight was encouraging us to embrace is what he called the relational approach.  This approach is framed by desiring to know the God of the Bible or the 'I' and 'You' behind the Bible.  Here are a few tenets through which this approach flows.  First, we need to understand that the Bible is God's spoken word to us.  The Bible is not God but it points to God.  The Bible is God's way of assuring us that God is there and is not silent.  Second, we are invited to listen to God through the Bible and respond.  Third, we enter into the Bible's own conversation and the conversation that has been going on throughout church history.  There is a community focus to reading and understanding the Bible.  It cannot be done in a vacuum.

McKnight's claim is that the relational approach leads to a better understanding of who God is and what God has called us to.  The relational approach leads to us being able to respond to God in love and respect instead of fear and submission.  One quote that I especailly loved is that "having the right view of the Bible is not the point, but having a relationship (or engaging) with the God of the Bible is the point."

McKnight then moved on to talking a bit about Missional Listening.  He said that the biggest complaint that God has of the people is that they do not listen.  His call is for us to be attentive enough to hear the words of God, allow them to sink in our very being and then to go and do what they say.  When we engage in missional listening we will truly know God and follow God's desire for us to love and God and to love others.  It is not about gathering information, but it's about how we are following what God has asked us to be about.  Missional listening is inspired and it is a process.

I hope this is a fair summary of what McKnight was presenting to us.  I did buy the DVD so when I get it I'll watch it again.  What do you think?  What is your understanding of the Bible?  If you have shifted away from the authoritarian approach do you ever find yourself reverting back to the old ways?  How can we help others to view the Bible in this way without pushing them over the edge or is that what needs to happen?

By the way, I just received McKnight's new book, The Blue Parakeet, where I believe most of this talk came from.  I will let you know that later on as well.

2 comments:

  1. REALLY great post and some very good ideas to chew on. I was particularly intrigued by the concept of relating to Scripture (relating to God) vs. the widely understood submission to God's Word idea.

    I wonder, is it even possible to submit without relationship? Now I can think of hypothetical situations where (let's say) women have submitted to husbands out of fear or children to parents or whatever - but that is a behavioral submission - a "doing" not a "being." In other words, God said it, I believe it, but is that really good enough for me? Apparently not - or the world would look very different because Christians would look very different.

    Make sense?

    ReplyDelete
  2. It makes sense to me but we are now saying that many people in the church do not have a relationship with God. That may be going a bit too far, but I believe that those who view through an authoritative lens don't have a proper relationship with God.

    As I'm thinking through this and reading your comment I keep thinking back to Rob Bell's teaching "The God's Aren't Angry." In it Rob tries to show that the God we serve works in a different way from other gods. Our God does not bless us based on our performance or how good we are at appeasing God. Our God is doing something totally different through grace, love and mercy. In other words our God does not demand sacrifice, but relationship.

    The problem is that relationship is much harder especially with a God we can't see, smell, hear or touch. We have enough problems relating to other humans, much less God.

    ReplyDelete